SD TImes: Software Development Click for BZ Media
Search
NewsCurrent IssueBack IssuesColumnsOpinionsResource LinksSubscription services
About UsMedia KitSite MapContact UsHome

Advertisement







Linux Vendors Move to Protect Customers
OSDL starts legal fund while Novell indemnifies SUSE users
By Yvonne L. Lee
                             
February 1, 2004 Linux vendors made a pre-emptive strike in January, offering legal help to end users that The SCO Group may attempt to sue for copyright infringement.

The Open Source Development Labs (OSDL) announced plans for a US$10 million fund to help defray legal expenses of Linux users involved in litigation with SCO. IBM Corp., Intel Corp. and MontaVista Software Inc. have already contributed an initial $3 million. The fund is separate from the Open Source Now fund, which Red Hat Inc. established with $1 million in August 2003 to help defend Linux developers.

“OSDL has been talking with its members and core Linux developers for some time about the best way to help customers deploying Linux have more peace of mind in the face of escalating SCO attacks against Linux users,” said Nelson Pratt, OSDL director of marketing. “Companies on OSDL’s Linux User Advisory Council were not individually concerned about SCO legal attacks, but they thought this would be a good way to help other companies who might be concerned to feel more confident.”

Separately, Novell Inc. announced that it would indemnify SUSE Linux against intellectual property challenges.

In November 2003, SCO announced that it would be filing copyright infringement suits against enterprise Linux users within 90 days. If the Lindon, Utah, company held true to this threat, such suits would be filed by mid-February. SCO has reiterated its intention of filing suits in that time frame.

The OSDL fund could thwart any future suits by SCO, according to John Ferrell, head of the intellectual property practice at the Palo Alto, Calif., law firm Carr & Ferrell LLP. It also takes away SCO’s ability to hire a firm on a contingency basis, he said. “If you know that you’re basically fighting a legal fund of $10 million, you’re going to have to put up $10 million of your own,” Ferrell said. “Ten million is a huge amount of money for a law firm.”

The contribution to the OSDL legal defense fund is the first time Intel has stepped into the fray in SCO’s assault on Linux. Both Linux and Unix run on Intel’s processors. The Santa Clara-based company, which is part of the OSDL board, decided to contribute because it and its customers could be the target of suits, according to company spokesman Chuck Mulloy.

“We’ve received a letter because we do use Linux in our IT systems,” Mulloy said. “Our customers and many of their customers have also received letters.”

Also part of the equation was SCO’s refusal to give specific details of how and where it believed its intellectual property rights were infringed.

“By refusing to disclose the basis of the claims, they’re preventing the Linux community from remedying the potential infringement,” said Mulloy. “There’s a fundamental fairness issue in terms of where’s the infringement and how can it be fixed.”

Embedded systems software maker MontaVista also said it has been approached by embedded device manufacturers asking whether to pay the $32 per device that SCO has sought from embedded Linux users.

“If you build embedded devices based on embedded Linux, and you’re all of a sudden told you have to pay a $32 per-unit fee or redeploy, in some ways the worry’s even greater for the enterprise,” said MontaVista’s director of strategic marketing, Bill Weinberg.

SCO charges US$699 per processor for the enterprise license.

In SCO’s official response, president and CEO Darl McBride said, “If vendors feel so confident with the intellectual property foundation under their massive contributions into Linux, then they should put their money where their mouth is and protect end users with true vendor-based indemnification.”

Novell then said it would indemnify customers who bought SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 8 and who after Jan. 12 obtain upgrade protection and a qualifying technical support contract from Novell or from a participating Novell or SUSE Linux partner.

IBM has not indemnified its customers. “IBM’s working with customers on a case-by-case basis,” said company spokesperson Trink Guarino, adding that IBM is the only company that has been sued so far.

In related news, SCO expanded its Intellectual Property License for Linux to international customers.








Advertisement

















Back to Top

news
| current issue | back issues | columns | opinions | resource links
about | site map | subscriptions | media kit | contact us

Copyright © 1999-2004 BZ Media, LLC, all rights reserved.
Phone: 516-922-2101 • E-mail: info@bzmedia.com